If Pinterest hadn’t gone after affiliate marketers, the FTC might have

The legal minutia is such a head scramble….


On Friday, Pinterest banned affiliate links on its site, claiming that they cluttered up people’s feeds with spam. Most media companies called foul, saying that Pinterest was putting its own financial interest above its users, some of whom would lose big streams of revenue without affiliate links.

There’s truth to that, but it’s not the whole story.

Affiliate links connect a pinned image to the site selling the product. It’s an ad, essentially. But unlike promoted pins, these ads aren’t labeled as such. People with a lot of followers receive money from companies or advertisers to share these images. As a result, the affiliate pins surreptitiously creep into people’s Pinterest streams, disguised as hand-selected content.

This kind of native marketing is a mainstay in the social media era. Celebrities and influencers on all sorts of applications from Vine to Instagram do the same.

But just because it’s normal doesn’t mean it’s legal. The…

View original post 250 more words


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s